Gitmo detainees and President Obama

Comments

Why would you need to find halfway houses for the detainees? Send them back to their nation of origin. If you don't have any evidence they were terrorists in the first place, then that shouldn't be a problem. If you do, you cycle them through the justice system.

Where's the conflict?

Let's just inprison the whole stinking world & just add the cost to the National Debt. Isn't Cuba one big prison?

I - I wonder if the detainees will be ruled under American justice rules. And, since they were probably not read their Miranda rights, they will be set free regardless of their guilt in trying to kill American soldiers.
Z - Cuba is one big prison. That's rich. I guess things must be bad in Cuba, because Cubans are swimming through shark infested waters on floatees in order to reach Florida.
If there's enough evidence to try them in the USA, then they'll be tried by military law. I don't remember exactly what that's called, but it gives a lot of latitude that doesn't exist in a normal courtroom. It's not likely they'd be tried here anyway, if they're really the "enemy battlefield combatants" they're claimed to be. Send them back to their country of origin and let them deal with it.
I - Firstly, there is a question in legal circles if these enemy battlefield combatants can be tried in our military courts as it now exists. I have heard legal scholars address this issue.

Secondly, if they are sent back to their home country, will we have to fight them again somewhere else. Because, their home country may just turn them loose or let them escape.

Thirdly, Bush made a poor decision to put them in Cuba. I suggested at the time it would be better to keep them Iraq. And, treat them a POWs. When the new government is established in Iraq or Afghanistan, let them return to their home country.

In WWII and the Korean War, many enemy combatants were just shot in the battlefield.
1. If we can't, their home country certainly can. Lack of bureaucracy may lead to some brutality, but honestly, if they were REALLY caught on a battlefield, then they can be dealt with as such. After all, they are supposedly terrorists, are they not?

2. If their home country is really so foolish as to do that, we should be re-examining our relationship with that country. This assumes of course that these people are actually guilty. And if there's that much proof.... see earlier comments.

3. Bush's mistake was trying to hide what he was doing rather than using the proper channels. If there's shortcomings in the proper way of doing things, then fix them.

As for shooting them, if these people are really the Al'Qaeda they are claimed to be, I have no problem with shooting them on the battlefield. Screw the protocols of surrender. They don't negotiate, neither do we.
I - You make some good points. I am not quite sure of the wisdom of using Cuba as a prison for enemy combatants. We should have treated them as POWs.

On the other hand, we are "Monday Morning Quarterbacking". It is easy to second guess the decision to use Cuba as a prison. Now, we must deal with it. The next time a president wants to get involved in "Nation Building", I hope the voters run him and his entire party out of Washington.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Timothy

About Me

Timothy
United States
If you are organized, you can do just about anything.
Messaging:
Send

Neighborhood

Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.

Archives